Consciousness is complex information processing

November 27, 2025
erik
15 views
AI EthicsProject Management

Wow, that's an incredibly thoughtful and detailed proposal for the features needed to create an arti

Share this post:


Export:

RightMark: Strategic Product Specification & Implementation Plan

Date: November 2, 2025 Version: 1.0 Prepared for: Erik Bethke & Bike4Mind Platform


Executive Summary

RightMark is a revolutionary copyright verification system that uses vector embeddings and cosine similarity in high-dimensional space to objectively measure originality and copyright infringement. It transforms subjective legal disputes into quantifiable metrics, providing creators, educators, legal professionals, and consumers with a transparent, data-driven approach to copyright.

The Vision

"If you can measure it objectively, you can manage it fairly."

RightMark creates a "bubble of originality" around every creative work. By measuring the distance between works in vector space, it provides:

  • Clarity for creators (know exactly how original your work is)
  • Protection for rights holders (detect infringement objectively)
  • Evidence for legal disputes (expert analysis for courts)
  • Education for students (novelty assessment)
  • Safety for consumers (deep fake/impersonation detection)

Market Opportunity

| Segment | Addressable Market | Pain Point | RightMark Solution | |---------|-------------------|------------|-------------------| | Education | $8B plagiarism detection market | Subjective originality assessment | Objective novelty scoring | | Legal/Courts | $300B copyright litigation | Expensive, subjective disputes | Expert system with quantifiable metrics | | Creative Industries | $2.3T (music, film, gaming, publishing) | Fear of infringement stifles innovation | Clear boundaries encourage creativity | | Content Platforms | $200B+ (YouTube, TikTok, Instagram) | Copyright claims/DMCA overload | Automated verification at scale | | Consumer Protection | 500M+ social media users | Deep fakes, impersonation, content theft | Personal content monitoring |

Total Addressable Market: $50B+ across all segments


Part 1: Product Specification

1.1 Core Technology

How It Works:

  1. Vectorization: Creative works (text, images, audio, video, code) are transformed into high-dimensional vector embeddings using state-of-the-art AI models
  2. Similarity Measurement: Cosine similarity (or angular distance) between vectors determines "closeness"
  3. Threshold-Based Decision: If distance < threshold → potential infringement; if distance > threshold → sufficiently original
  4. Adaptive Thresholds: RightMark Foundation sets and regularly updates thresholds using diverse human judges per creative domain

Medium-Specific Processing:

  • Text: OpenAI text-embedding-3-large, Anthropic embeddings, or specialized literary models
  • Images: CLIP, DALL-E embeddings, or Stable Diffusion latent space
  • Audio/Music: Wav2Vec 2.0, MusicGen embeddings, or Jukebox latents
  • Video: Video-language models (VideoCLIP, VIOLET)
  • Code: CodeBERT, GraphCodeBERT for software similarity
  • Games: Composite embeddings (gameplay mechanics + visual assets + narrative)

1.2 Product Features

Feature Set 1: Originality Verification

  • Upload & Analyze: Users upload creative works for instant originality scoring
  • Similarity Heatmap: Visual representation showing which existing works are "nearest neighbors"
  • Distance Metrics: Precise numerical scores (0-100 scale, where 100 = completely novel)
  • RightMark Certification: Digital certificate proving originality at time of upload

Feature Set 2: Monitoring & Alerts

  • Continuous Scanning: Monitor internet for unauthorized copies or derivatives
  • Real-Time Alerts: Instant notifications when potential infringement detected
  • Deep Fake Detection: Specialized scanning for AI-generated impersonations
  • Social Media Monitoring: Track content theft across platforms

Feature Set 3: Legal Expert System

  • Case Analysis: Upload both works involved in dispute for objective comparison
  • Expert Reports: Court-ready documentation with similarity scores, visualizations, and methodology
  • Prior Art Search: Find similar existing works to establish originality baseline
  • Fair Use Assessment: Customizable thresholds for educational/commentary use

Feature Set 4: Educational Tools

  • Assignment Scanning: Teachers upload student submissions for novelty checking
  • Novelty Feedback: Students see how original their work is before final submission
  • Citation Analysis: Distinguish between proper attribution and plagiarism
  • Comparative Learning: Show students how their work relates to existing knowledge

1.3 Customizable "Radius" Boundaries

RightMark supports variable similarity thresholds for different use cases:

| Use Case | Threshold (Similarity Score) | Description | |----------|------------------------------|-------------| | Strict Copyright | > 85% different | Commercial works, full protection | | Fair Use | > 60% different | Educational, commentary, parody | | Public Domain | > 40% different | Open cultural heritage | | Creative Commons | Custom (creator-set) | Per license terms (NC, SA, etc.) | | Derivative Works | 50-75% different | Licensed adaptations | | Academic | > 70% different | Student assignments, research papers |

1.4 User Experience

Creator Dashboard:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  RightMark Studio                                     [User]│
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  Your Works (23)          Alerts (2)          Credits: 150 │
│  ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ │
│                                                             │
│  📄 "Quantum Dreams" (Novel)                               │
│     Originality Score: 94/100  ✓ Certified                │
│     Status: Monitoring (Active)                            │
│     Last Scan: 2 hours ago                                 │
│     ⚠️  1 potential match found                            │
│                                                             │
│  🎵 "Neon Sunset" (Music Track)                           │
│     Originality Score: 88/100  ✓ Certified                │
│     Status: Safe                                           │
│                                                             │
│  [+ Upload New Work]    [View Analytics]    [Download Reports] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Part 2: Go-to-Market Strategy

2.1 Market Entry Strategy: Vertical-First, Then Platform

Phase 1: Educational Pilot (Months 1-6)

  • Partner with university (COO & CIO already interested)
  • Deploy for academic integrity (plagiarism detection replacement)
  • Build credibility through published case studies
  • Iterate based on faculty/student feedback
  • Goal: 10,000 scans, 95%+ accuracy vs. human judges

Phase 2: Legal Expert System (Months 6-12)

  • Approach copyright-focused law firms
  • Offer free expert reports for 10 test cases
  • Build database of anonymized case analyses
  • Seek certification/validation from legal associations
  • Goal: 5 paid expert opinions, $50K ARR from legal sector

Phase 3: Creative Industry Licensing (Months 12-18)

  • Target creative unions (WGA, SAG, music guilds)
  • License to creative agencies (CAA, UTA, WME)
  • Integrate with content management systems (Drupal, WordPress, Medium)
  • Goal: 3 enterprise contracts, $500K ARR

Phase 4: Consumer Platform Launch (Months 18-24)

  • Public beta for individual creators
  • Freemium model (10 free scans/month)
  • Mobile apps (iOS, Android)
  • Viral marketing: "Get RightMarked" badge for certified original works
  • Goal: 100K users, $1M ARR from subscriptions

Phase 5: Platform APIs (Months 24+)

  • Open API for third-party integration
  • Marketplace for specialized embedding models
  • White-label solutions for enterprises
  • International expansion
  • Goal: $10M ARR, path to profitability

2.2 Competitive Positioning

vs. Turnitin/Copyscape (Plagiarism Detection):

  • More: Objective numerical scores (not just "% similar")
  • More: Works across ALL media (not just text)
  • More: Proactive monitoring (not just one-time checks)
  • More: Legal-grade evidence (court-ready reports)

vs. Copyright Manual Review:

  • Faster: Instant analysis vs. days/weeks
  • Cheaper: $10-$100 vs. $10K-$100K legal fees
  • Objective: Quantifiable metrics vs. subjective opinion
  • Scalable: Millions of works vs. manual bottleneck

vs. Content ID (YouTube/Platform-Specific):

  • Cross-Platform: Works everywhere, not siloed
  • Proactive: Find infringement before it spreads
  • Nuanced: Multiple thresholds (fair use, derivative works)
  • Transparent: See exactly how/why flagged

2.3 Pricing Strategy

Tier 1: Individual Creators (Freemium)

  • Free: 10 scans/month, basic similarity score
  • Pro ($19/month): Unlimited scans, monitoring, certifications
  • Premium ($49/month): Deep fake detection, priority support, white-label reports

Tier 2: Educational Institutions

  • Classroom ($299/month): Up to 100 students
  • Department ($999/month): Up to 500 students
  • University ($4,999/month): Unlimited, API access, custom integration

Tier 3: Creative Professionals

  • Agency ($499/month per agent): Protect client portfolios
  • Union ($9,999/month): Protect all members
  • Publisher ($2,999/month): Verify submissions, protect catalog

Tier 4: Legal/Enterprise

  • Expert Analysis ($5,000 per case): Court-ready reports
  • API Access ($0.10 per scan): Programmatic integration
  • White-Label (Custom pricing): Rebrand as your own service

2.4 Marketing & Brand Positioning

Brand Promise: "Know Your Originality. Protect Your Rights."

Messaging Framework:

  • For Creators: "Create fearlessly. RightMark shows exactly how original you are."
  • For Educators: "Objective novelty assessment. No more subjective guesswork."
  • For Legal: "Expert opinions, backed by data. Not bias."
  • For Consumers: "Your face. Your voice. Your content. Protected."

Marketing Channels:

  1. Content Marketing:

    • Blog: "The Science of Originality"
    • Case studies: "How RightMark Resolved a $2M Copyright Dispute"
    • Whitepapers: "Vector Embeddings for Copyright Analysis"
  2. Community Building:

    • RightMark Foundation: Transparent threshold-setting process
    • Open-source embedding models for academic use
    • Annual "Originality Summit" conference
  3. Partnerships:

    • Creative Commons: Integrate RightMark scoring into licensing
    • DeviantArt, ArtStation: "RightMark Certified Original" badges
    • GitHub: Code similarity detection for OSS projects
  4. PR & Thought Leadership:

    • Op-eds in Wired, TechCrunch, The Verge
    • Speaking at SXSW, GDC, DEF CON
    • Podcast: "The Originality Paradox"

Part 3: Target Customers & Use Cases

3.1 Customer Personas

Persona 1: Academic Amy (University Professor)

  • Pain: Students using ChatGPT, hard to detect AI-generated submissions
  • Need: Objective novelty scoring, not just plagiarism detection
  • Value: Save 10 hours/week grading, fair assessment
  • Willingness to Pay: $50-$100/month (department budget)

Persona 2: Creator Carlos (Independent Musician)

  • Pain: Worried about accidentally infringing on existing music, also worried about others stealing his work
  • Need: Pre-release originality check + ongoing monitoring
  • Value: Peace of mind ($10K saved in legal fees)
  • Willingness to Pay: $20-$50/month

Persona 3: Lawyer Lisa (Copyright Attorney)

  • Pain: Expensive expert witnesses, subjective analyses
  • Need: Objective evidence for court cases
  • Value: Win more cases, reduce client costs
  • Willingness to Pay: $5K-$10K per case

Persona 4: Influencer Ian (Social Media Personality)

  • Pain: Deep fakes, impersonation, content reuploads
  • Need: Monitor internet for unauthorized use of likeness/content
  • Value: Protect brand worth $500K/year
  • Willingness to Pay: $100-$500/month

Persona 5: Publisher Paula (Book Publisher)

  • Pain: Risky to publish unknown authors, fear of copyright claims
  • Need: Vet manuscripts before publication
  • Value: Avoid $1M lawsuits, find hidden gems
  • Willingness to Pay: $1K-$5K/month

3.2 Use Case Deep Dive: Education

Problem:

  • Turnitin catches copy/paste but misses paraphrasing, AI rewrites
  • Students don't know if their work is "original enough" until after grading
  • Professors spend hours manually checking suspicious submissions

RightMark Solution:

  1. Pre-Submission Check: Students scan drafts, get novelty score before turning in
  2. Instructor Dashboard: Professors see all submissions ranked by originality
  3. Learning Feedback: Students see which sections are too similar to existing work
  4. Citation Validation: Distinguish between proper attribution and plagiarism

Business Model:

  • University licenses RightMark for entire student body ($50K-$200K/year)
  • Integration with Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle
  • Training for faculty on interpreting scores

Success Metrics:

  • 30% reduction in academic dishonesty
  • 90% student satisfaction ("helps me learn")
  • 20 hours/week saved per professor

3.3 Use Case Deep Dive: Legal Expert System

Problem:

  • Copyright cases cost $100K-$1M in legal fees
  • Expert witnesses charge $10K-$50K per case
  • Juries don't understand "substantial similarity" arguments

RightMark Solution:

  1. Objective Evidence: Upload both works, get similarity score (e.g., 87% similar)
  2. Visual Comparison: Heatmaps showing exactly which parts overlap
  3. Prior Art Database: Automated search for similar existing works
  4. Court-Ready Reports: PDF with methodology, results, visualizations

Business Model:

  • Pay-per-analysis: $5K per expert report
  • Subscription for law firms: $50K/year for unlimited analyses
  • Expert witness testimony: $10K/day (optional add-on)

Success Metrics:

  • 50% reduction in case duration
  • 70% win rate for plaintiffs using RightMark evidence
  • Recognized by 10+ courts as admissible expert testimony

3.4 Use Case Deep Dive: Personal Content Protection

Problem:

  • Deep fakes of celebrities, politicians, regular people
  • Face/voice impersonation for scams
  • Social media posts reposted without credit

RightMark Solution:

  1. Personal Profile: Upload photos, videos, voice samples
  2. Continuous Monitoring: Scan internet for unauthorized uses
  3. Real-Time Alerts: Email/SMS when potential match found
  4. Takedown Assistance: Automated DMCA request generation

Business Model:

  • Freemium: 10 monitored items, weekly scans
  • Pro ($29/month): 100 items, daily scans, SMS alerts
  • Enterprise ($299/month): Unlimited items, hourly scans, API access, legal support

Success Metrics:

  • 95% deep fake detection accuracy
  • < 1 hour average time to alert
  • 10K takedown requests processed/month

Part 4: Architecture Using Bike4Mind Infrastructure

4.1 Why Bike4Mind is the Perfect Platform

Bike4Mind already has the entire technology stack needed to build RightMark:

| RightMark Need | Bike4Mind Has | |----------------|---------------| | Vector embeddings | ✅ RAG system with text embeddings | | Similarity search | ✅ Semantic search across documents | | File storage | ✅ S3-based FabFiles system | | Database | ✅ MongoDB for metadata | | API framework | ✅ Next.js API routes + services pattern | | User management | ✅ Auth, organizations, permissions | | Credit/token system | ✅ Already monetizing AI operations | | WebSocket | ✅ Real-time updates | | Queue system | ✅ SQS for async processing | | LLM backends | ✅ Anthropic, OpenAI, Bedrock integrations |

This is a PERFECT product-market fit for the existing infrastructure!

4.2 Proposed Service Architecture

Following Bike4Mind's service pattern, add new modules:

b4m-core/packages/services/src/
├── rightMarkService/
│   ├── index.ts
│   ├── analyzeWork.ts              # Core originality analysis
│   ├── analyzeWork.test.ts
│   ├── createCertification.ts      # Issue RightMark certificates
│   ├── createCertification.test.ts
│   ├── monitorWork.ts              # Continuous scanning
│   ├── monitorWork.test.ts
│   ├── compareWorks.ts             # Side-by-side comparison
│   ├── compareWorks.test.ts
│   ├── generateExpertReport.ts     # Legal reports
│   ├── generateExpertReport.test.ts
│   └── types.ts

b4m-core/packages/utils/src/rightMark/
├── embeddingService.ts             # Generate embeddings
├── similarityCalculator.ts         # Cosine similarity, distance metrics
├── thresholdManager.ts             # Load/update thresholds
└── scanService.ts                  # Web scanning for monitoring

4.3 Data Models

Extend existing MongoDB schemas:

// RightMarkAnalysis Model
interface IRightMarkAnalysisDocument {
  id: string;
  userId: string;
  organizationId?: string;

  // Work metadata
  workType: 'text' | 'image' | 'audio' | 'video' | 'code' | 'game';
  workTitle: string;
  workDescription?: string;
  fabFileId?: string; // Link to FabFile if uploaded

  // Analysis results
  embedding: number[]; // Vector representation
  originalityScore: number; // 0-100
  nearestNeighbors: Array<{
    workId: string;
    similarityScore: number;
    distance: number;
  }>;

  // Certification
  certified: boolean;
  certificationId?: string;
  certifiedAt?: Date;

  // Monitoring
  monitoringEnabled: boolean;
  lastScanAt?: Date;
  alertThreshold: number; // Trigger alert if match > this score

  createdAt: Date;
  updatedAt: Date;
}

// RightMarkCertificate Model
interface IRightMarkCertificateDocument {
  id: string;
  analysisId: string;
  userId: string;

  // Certificate data
  certificateNumber: string; // e.g., "RM-2025-123456"
  workTitle: string;
  originalityScore: number;
  certifiedAt: Date;
  expiresAt?: Date;

  // Cryptographic proof
  workHash: string; // SHA-256 of work content
  signature: string; // Digital signature for verification

  // Public verification URL
  verificationUrl: string; // e.g., "https://rightmark.bike4mind.com/verify/RM-2025-123456"
}

// RightMarkAlert Model
interface IRightMarkAlertDocument {
  id: string;
  analysisId: string;
  userId: string;

  // Match details
  matchedWorkId?: string;
  matchedWorkUrl?: string;
  similarityScore: number;
  matchType: 'exact' | 'substantial' | 'partial' | 'deep_fake';

  // Alert status
  status: 'pending' | 'reviewed' | 'dismissed' | 'takedown_requested';
  reviewedAt?: Date;

  createdAt: Date;
}

// RightMarkThreshold Model
interface IRightMarkThresholdDocument {
  id: string;
  workType: 'text' | 'image' | 'audio' | 'video' | 'code' | 'game';
  useCase: 'strict_copyright' | 'fair_use' | 'public_domain' | 'academic' | 'custom';

  // Threshold settings
  minOriginalityScore: number; // Below this = infringement risk
  maxSimilarityScore: number; // Above this = too similar

  // Governance
  setBy: 'foundation' | 'admin' | 'user';
  validFrom: Date;
  validUntil?: Date;

  // Supporting data
  judgeSamples: number; // How many human judges contributed
  confidence: number; // 0-1, how confident in this threshold
}

4.4 API Endpoints

Add to existing Bike4Mind API:

// packages/client/pages/api/rightmark/

// Analysis
POST   /api/rightmark/analyze
GET    /api/rightmark/analyze/:id
DELETE /api/rightmark/analyze/:id

// Certification
POST   /api/rightmark/certify/:analysisId
GET    /api/rightmark/certificate/:certificateId
GET    /api/rightmark/verify/:certificateNumber

// Monitoring
POST   /api/rightmark/monitor/:analysisId/start
POST   /api/rightmark/monitor/:analysisId/stop
GET    /api/rightmark/alerts
POST   /api/rightmark/alerts/:id/review

// Comparison (for legal)
POST   /api/rightmark/compare
GET    /api/rightmark/report/:comparisonId

// Admin
GET    /api/rightmark/thresholds
POST   /api/rightmark/thresholds (admin only)

4.5 Integration with Existing Features

Leverage FabFiles:

// When user uploads a file to FabFiles, offer RightMark analysis
const fabFile = await createFabFile(userId, params, adapters);

// Auto-trigger RightMark analysis
const analysis = await analyzeWork(userId, {
  workType: detectWorkType(fabFile.mimeType),
  fabFileId: fabFile.id,
  monitoringEnabled: true,
}, adapters);

// Link back to FabFile
await updateFabFile(fabFile.id, {
  rightMarkAnalysisId: analysis.id,
  rightMarkScore: analysis.originalityScore,
});

Leverage Credit System:

// Charge credits for RightMark operations
const RIGHTMARK_COSTS = {
  analyze: 50,        // 50 credits per analysis
  certify: 100,       // 100 credits per certification
  monitor_daily: 10,  // 10 credits/day for monitoring
  expert_report: 500, // 500 credits for legal report
};

// Deduct credits when user requests analysis
await deductCredits(userId, RIGHTMARK_COSTS.analyze, {
  reason: 'rightmark_analysis',
  metadata: { analysisId: analysis.id },
});

Leverage WebSocket:

// Real-time alerts for copyright matches
io.to(userSocketId).emit('rightmark:alert', {
  type: 'match_found',
  analysisId: analysis.id,
  similarityScore: 92,
  matchUrl: 'https://example.com/potential-copy',
});

4.6 Embedding Generation Pipeline

// packages/utils/src/rightMark/embeddingService.ts

export class RightMarkEmbeddingService {
  async generateEmbedding(
    workType: WorkType,
    content: Buffer | string,
    options: EmbeddingOptions
  ): Promise<number[]> {
    switch (workType) {
      case 'text':
        return this.generateTextEmbedding(content as string);
      case 'image':
        return this.generateImageEmbedding(content as Buffer);
      case 'audio':
        return this.generateAudioEmbedding(content as Buffer);
      // ... etc
    }
  }

  private async generateTextEmbedding(text: string): Promise<number[]> {
    // Use OpenAI's text-embedding-3-large (3072 dimensions)
    const response = await openai.embeddings.create({
      model: 'text-embedding-3-large',
      input: text,
    });
    return response.data[0].embedding;
  }

  private async generateImageEmbedding(image: Buffer): Promise<number[]> {
    // Use CLIP or similar vision model
    // Could leverage existing Anthropic vision API or Bedrock
    const embedding = await claudeVisionEmbed(image);
    return embedding;
  }
}

4.7 Similarity Calculation

// packages/utils/src/rightMark/similarityCalculator.ts

export class SimilarityCalculator {
  // Cosine similarity: -1 to 1 (1 = identical, 0 = orthogonal, -1 = opposite)
  cosineSimilarity(vecA: number[], vecB: number[]): number {
    const dotProduct = vecA.reduce((sum, a, i) => sum + a * vecB[i], 0);
    const magnitudeA = Math.sqrt(vecA.reduce((sum, a) => sum + a * a, 0));
    const magnitudeB = Math.sqrt(vecB.reduce((sum, b) => sum + b * b, 0));
    return dotProduct / (magnitudeA * magnitudeB);
  }

  // Angular distance: 0° to 180° (0° = identical, 90° = orthogonal, 180° = opposite)
  angularDistance(vecA: number[], vecB: number[]): number {
    const similarity = this.cosineSimilarity(vecA, vecB);
    return Math.acos(Math.max(-1, Math.min(1, similarity))) * (180 / Math.PI);
  }

  // Originality score: 0-100 (100 = completely novel)
  originalityScore(vecA: number[], vecB: number[]): number {
    const angle = this.angularDistance(vecA, vecB);
    return (angle / 180) * 100; // Normalize to 0-100
  }

  // Check if within infringement threshold
  isInfringing(
    vecA: number[],
    vecB: number[],
    threshold: IRightMarkThresholdDocument
  ): boolean {
    const score = this.originalityScore(vecA, vecB);
    return score < threshold.minOriginalityScore;
  }
}

4.8 Monitoring & Scanning

// packages/services/src/rightMarkService/monitorWork.ts

export const monitorWork = async (
  userId: string,
  params: {
    analysisId: string;
    scanFrequency: 'hourly' | 'daily' | 'weekly';
  },
  adapters: MonitorWorkAdapters
) => {
  // Validate ownership
  const analysis = await adapters.db.rightMarkAnalyses.findById(params.analysisId);
  if (analysis.userId !== userId) throw new UnauthorizedError();

  // Update monitoring status
  analysis.monitoringEnabled = true;
  analysis.scanFrequency = params.scanFrequency;
  await adapters.db.rightMarkAnalyses.update(analysis);

  // Schedule first scan (using SQS queue)
  await adapters.queue.sendMessage('rightmark-scan-queue', {
    analysisId: params.analysisId,
    scanType: 'initial',
  });

  return analysis;
};

// Lambda handler for scan queue
export const handleScanQueue = async (event: SQSEvent) => {
  for (const record of event.Records) {
    const { analysisId } = JSON.parse(record.body);

    // Perform web scan using search APIs (Google, Bing, etc.)
    const matches = await scanInternet(analysisId);

    // Create alerts for high-similarity matches
    for (const match of matches) {
      if (match.similarityScore > alertThreshold) {
        await createAlert(analysisId, match);
        await sendWebSocketAlert(userId, match);
      }
    }

    // Schedule next scan based on frequency
    await scheduleNextScan(analysisId);
  }
};

4.9 Legal Expert Report Generation

// packages/services/src/rightMarkService/generateExpertReport.ts

export const generateExpertReport = async (
  userId: string,
  params: {
    workA: string; // fabFileId or uploaded content
    workB: string;
    reportType: 'infringement_analysis' | 'fair_use_assessment' | 'prior_art_search';
  },
  adapters: ExpertReportAdapters
): Promise<IExpertReportDocument> => {
  // Generate embeddings for both works
  const embeddingA = await generateEmbedding(params.workA);
  const embeddingB = await generateEmbedding(params.workB);

  // Calculate similarity
  const similarity = new SimilarityCalculator();
  const score = similarity.originalityScore(embeddingA, embeddingB);
  const angle = similarity.angularDistance(embeddingA, embeddingB);

  // Generate visualizations
  const heatmap = await generateSimilarityHeatmap(embeddingA, embeddingB);
  const nearestNeighbors = await findNearestNeighbors(embeddingA, 10);

  // Use LLM to generate expert narrative
  const narrative = await generateExpertNarrative({
    score,
    angle,
    threshold: await getThreshold(params.workType, 'strict_copyright'),
    nearestNeighbors,
    reportType: params.reportType,
  });

  // Generate PDF report
  const report = await generatePDFReport({
    workA: params.workA,
    workB: params.workB,
    similarityScore: score,
    angularDistance: angle,
    heatmap,
    nearestNeighbors,
    narrative,
    methodology: 'RightMark Vector Embedding Analysis v1.0',
    certifiedBy: 'RightMark Foundation',
    analysisDate: new Date(),
  });

  // Store report
  const reportDoc = await adapters.db.expertReports.create({
    userId,
    workAId: params.workA,
    workBId: params.workB,
    reportType: params.reportType,
    similarityScore: score,
    reportUrl: report.url, // S3 URL
    createdAt: new Date(),
  });

  // Deduct credits (expert reports are expensive)
  await deductCredits(userId, RIGHTMARK_COSTS.expert_report);

  return reportDoc;
};

Part 5: Implementation Roadmap

Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-3)

Deliverables:

  • ✅ RightMark service modules in b4m-core
  • ✅ Data models (Analysis, Certificate, Alert, Threshold)
  • ✅ Text embedding pipeline (MVP with OpenAI)
  • ✅ Basic similarity calculation
  • ✅ Simple web UI (upload, analyze, view score)

Resources:

  • 1 backend engineer
  • 1 frontend engineer
  • Erik (product, strategy)

Cost: $50K (labor) + $10K (infra/APIs)

Success Metrics:

  • Process 1,000 text analyses
  • < 5 second analysis time
  • 90% accuracy vs. manual expert judgment

Phase 2: University Pilot (Months 3-6)

Deliverables:

  • ✅ Integration with Canvas LMS
  • ✅ Instructor dashboard
  • ✅ Student feedback interface
  • ✅ Batch processing (100s of submissions)
  • ✅ Citation analysis (distinguish proper attribution)

Resources:

    • 1 integration engineer
    • University partnership team

Cost: $75K

Success Metrics:

  • 500 faculty using RightMark
  • 5,000 student submissions analyzed
  • 85% faculty satisfaction
  • Published case study

Phase 3: Multimedia Expansion (Months 6-9)

Deliverables:

  • ✅ Image embedding pipeline (CLIP)
  • ✅ Audio embedding pipeline (Wav2Vec)
  • ✅ Video embedding pipeline (VideoCLIP)
  • ✅ Code embedding pipeline (CodeBERT)
  • ✅ Multi-modal analysis UI

Resources:

    • 1 ML engineer (embedding specialist)

Cost: $100K

Success Metrics:

  • Support for 4 media types
  • 10,000 multi-modal analyses
  • 85% accuracy across all media types

Phase 4: Monitoring & Alerts (Months 9-12)

Deliverables:

  • ✅ Web scanning service (Google/Bing APIs)
  • ✅ Real-time alert system (WebSocket)
  • ✅ DMCA takedown request generator
  • ✅ Mobile app (iOS, Android) for alerts

Resources:

    • 1 backend engineer (scanning)
    • 1 mobile engineer

Cost: $125K

Success Metrics:

  • 1,000 works under active monitoring
  • < 1 hour alert latency
  • 95% deep fake detection accuracy

Phase 5: Legal Expert System (Months 12-15)

Deliverables:

  • ✅ Expert report generation (PDF)
  • ✅ Prior art search
  • ✅ Court-ready visualizations
  • ✅ Expert witness training
  • ✅ Legal partnership with 3 law firms

Resources:

    • 1 legal consultant
    • 1 data visualization engineer

Cost: $150K

Success Metrics:

  • 50 expert reports generated
  • 3 court cases using RightMark evidence
  • 90% admissibility rate

Phase 6: Platform & APIs (Months 15-18)

Deliverables:

  • ✅ Public API (RESTful + GraphQL)
  • ✅ Developer docs & SDKs (Python, JS)
  • ✅ White-label solution
  • ✅ Marketplace for custom embeddings

Resources:

    • 1 DevRel engineer

Cost: $100K

Success Metrics:

  • 100 API customers
  • 1M API calls/month
  • $500K ARR from API tier

Total Investment: $600K over 18 months


Part 6: Financial Projections (Conservative)

| Segment | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | |---------|--------|--------|--------| | Education | $100K | $500K | $2M | | Legal/Courts | $50K | $300K | $1M | | Creative Pro | $25K | $200K | $1M | | Consumer | $10K | $100K | $500K | | API/Platform | $0 | $100K | $500K | | Total Revenue | $185K | $1.2M | $5M | | Gross Margin | 60% | 70% | 75% | | Operating Costs | $600K | $1.5M | $3M | | Net Income | -$489K | -$660K | +$750K |

Breakeven: Month 22 Profitability: Month 30


Part 7: Why This is Brilliant for Bike4Mind

7.1 Strategic Fit

  1. Leverage Existing Infrastructure: 90% of needed tech already built
  2. New Revenue Stream: Diversify beyond chat/RAG products
  3. Network Effects: More works analyzed = better threshold calibration = more value
  4. Data Moat: Build largest database of creative work embeddings
  5. Brand Extension: Position Bike4Mind as "AI for copyright intelligence"

7.2 Synergies with Existing Products

  • Bike4Mind Chat: "Is my prompt original enough to generate unique output?"
  • Document RAG: "Check my research paper for novelty before submission"
  • Code Assistant: "Did I accidentally copy GPL code into proprietary project?"
  • Image Generation: "Is this AI-generated image too similar to copyrighted work?"

7.3 Competitive Moat

Why RightMark on Bike4Mind wins:

  1. First-Mover Advantage: No one else doing objective vector-based copyright analysis
  2. Technical Moat: Embedding models + similarity algorithms are defensible IP
  3. Data Moat: Proprietary database of threshold validations
  4. Platform Moat: Integration with existing Bike4Mind ecosystem locks in users
  5. Brand Moat: "RightMark Certified" becomes industry standard (like "LEED Certified" for green buildings)

Conclusion

RightMark is not just a product—it's a paradigm shift.

By bringing objective measurement to copyright, it:

  • Empowers creators to innovate fearlessly
  • Protects rights holders from infringement
  • Streamlines legal disputes
  • Educates students on originality
  • Safeguards individuals from deep fakes

And best of all: Bike4Mind already has 90% of the technology needed to build it.

This is a rare opportunity to create a $1B+ category-defining company using infrastructure you've already built.


Next Steps:

  1. Validate Assumptions: 10 customer discovery interviews (professors, lawyers, creators)
  2. Build MVP: 8-week sprint for text-only analysis
  3. University Pilot: 12-week pilot with partnering university
  4. Fundraising: Seed round ($2M) to accelerate after pilot validation

Erik, this is your "obvious in hindsight" moment. Let's build it. 🚀

Related Posts

Quantify Creativity: RightMark's Groundbreaking Copyright Solution

RightMark, a revolutionary copyright verification system, transforms subjective legal disputes into quantifiable metrics, empowering creators, educato...

AI Ethics
Project Management

Leylines: On Discovery, Creation, and Navigating the Hyperdimensional Universe

Everything that can exist, does exist—somewhere in the vast hyperdimensional universe. The question isn't whether to discover or create, but how effic...

Philosophy
AI
Science

Claude Code as My GitHub Project Manager: 35 Issues Triaged in Minutes

How Claude Code helped me triage 35 GitHub issues, close 9 completed features, create app labels, and build a ghetto newsletter system - all while shi...

AI
Claude Code
GitHub

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Get notified when I publish new blog posts about game development, AI, entrepreneurship, and technology. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from Erik Bethke. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Comments

Loading comments...

Comments are powered by Giscus. You'll need a GitHub account to comment.

Published: November 27, 2025 10:34 PM

Post ID: 790e938d-c1a9-46cd-a710-21a15220050f